twitter
    Find out what I'm doing, Follow Me :)
Showing posts with label Changes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Changes. Show all posts

Thursday, March 31, 2011

French Property - Changes in Capital Gains Tax For Non-Residents

British owners of holiday homes in the Dordogne tend to think that French tax is irrelevant to them. It can come as a surprise when they're told on a sale that French capital gains tax will be payable. It comes as a further surprise when they learn the conditions for deductible capital expenditure. But the real sting in the tail is paying someone else to validate the figures they produce.

The basic principle

Capital gains tax is levied on the difference between the purchase and sale prices, less allowable capital expenditure. The purchase price is increased by the agency commission and notarial fees in order to give the true cost of purchase. The sale price is reduced by expenses incurred in connection with the sale - principally the survey costs associated with the obligatory "seller's pack".

The difference between these two figures will produce the gross capital gain.

Deductible expenditure

A vendor will be able to deduct from the gross capital gain certain capital expenditure - subject to conditions.

First, the expenditure must relate to "construction, reconstruction, enlargement or improvement". Construction, reconstruction and enlargement are easily understood: they will cover the extension or rebuilding of a house or building. "Construction" will extend to the installation of a swimming-pool.

The deceptive term is "improvement" - the French word used is "amelioration". You would have thought this broad enough to cover replacement kitchens and bathrooms. However, "improvement" is defined as installing equipment or raising the level of comfort without changing the structure of the property. Installing an elevator, central heating or air-conditioning are recognised as improvements, as would be the installation of a new bathroom. The refurbishment of an existing kitchen in that Dordogne home of yours may however not qualify.

Secondly, the work concerned must have been carried out by a French-registered tradesman. You cannot deduct materials you have purchased yourself - even if they are for use by the tradesman.

Thirdly, you must be able to produce supporting evidence of the expenditure in the form of invoices from the workmen concerned, and bank statements showing the payment.

If you are unable to meet these conditions, you can use instead a lump-sum allowance for expenses of 15% of the original purchase price, net of agency commission and notarial fees.

Deducting allowable capital expenditure from the gross capital gain brings you to a net figure.

Period of ownership

There is then a further allowance depending on the period of ownership. For every complete year of ownership after five years the gain is reduced by ten per cent. This means that if you own the property for fifteen years or more no capital gains tax will be payable in France.

Lump sum allowance

Once you have calculated the net capital gain you are allowed to deduct from it a fixed sum of 1,000 euros per individual owner - i.e. if the vendors are a married couple they will be able to deduct 2,000 euros.

Sting in the tail

Some of our British clients, selling their Dordogne homes, find the conditions for deductible expenses not only baffling but difficult to comply with - particularly where they have imported foreign labour or undertaken work themselves. Or they may simply not have retained the records needed by way of proof.

But the real sting in the tail comes with the requirement to appoint a French-resident tax representative in the case of all sales above a threshold of €150,000 - even if you are making a capital loss.

The tax representative assumes personal liability to the French tax authorities for the correctness of the return. And it goes without saying that he will charge a fee. In a recent straightforward case that we have had, a vendor selling at a considerable capital loss has had to pay the tax representative close to €1,000. If non-residents resent the system in the first place, the cost of a tax representative adds salt to the wound.

Monday, January 24, 2011

2011 US Tax Changes for Investments

Disclaimer: I am not a Certified Public Accountant (CPA), tax advisor or tax lawyer. Please talk with your CPA, tax advisor, or tax lawyer before making any investment decisions that may have tax consequences for your investments. One of my investment rules is know the tax ramifications of any investment that you plan to make before you make it, and make it tax efficient, whether under current tax laws or forecasted future tax changes. Taxes and/or government fees will be increasing over the next 5 years to help pay for the federal, state and local government deficits and future government entitlement programs (for example, health care). For example, to pay for the new health care plan high income earners in 2013 will experience an increase in Medicare payroll tax (.9%) and an additional tax (3.8%) on qualified dividends and capital gains.

Former President George W. Bush's tax cuts (BTC) were intended to expire at the end of 2010, reverting to the previous tax code for long-term capital gains and qualified dividends, reviving the estate tax and restoring the top marginal bracket of 39.6% at the beginning of 2011. On December 17, 2010 President Obama and the US Congress extended Bush's tax cuts for another 2 years (ending January 1, 2013), made changes to the estate tax and added a 2% reduction of the payroll (social security) tax. This will be one of largest stimulus packages for the US economy ever - approaching $1 trillion US.

Long-term capital gains tax (on assets held longer than one year): The current tax rate of 0% for taxpayers in the 10% and 15% tax brackets as of 2008 and 15% for everybody else will not change for the next two years. The pre-BTC rates were 10% for the 15% tax bracket and 20% for everybody else.

Qualified dividends: Qualified dividends will continue to be taxed at a maximum rate of 15% for the next two years. The pre-BTC rate was ordinary income based on your highest tax bracket. For example if you were a high income earner and your tax bracket was 39.6% your qualified dividends would have been taxed at 39.6% (this could be as high as 43.4% in 2013).

Top income tax bracket: Bush's tax cuts eliminated the top income tax bracket of 39.6% making the 35% the highest tax bracket and created a new 10% bracket for low income earners. Congress and President Obama extended 35% as the highest tax bracket and the 10% tax bracket for the next 2 years.

Revival of the estate tax:In 2010, as a result of several unusual circumstances, there is no limit on the size of an estate that is exempt from federal estate taxes. Starting in 2011 (and ending in 2013) the exemption will be $5 million per person and for a married couple up to $10 million will be exempt from federal and gift taxes. The top tax rate applied to the portion of estates exceeding those limits will be 35%, the lowest tax rate in 80 years.

Payroll tax decrease: Wage earners received a social security tax reduction of 2%, making the tax rate 4.2% up to the cap of $106,800 in 2011 (the cap will increase in 2012). If your wage income is at or over the cap, this will result in savings of $2,136, or about $40 per weekly paycheck. Congress did not renew the Making Work Pay tax credit of up to $400 for working individuals and up to $800 for married taxpayers filing joint returns (this was up to a maximum adjusted gross income level). Consequently, working individuals who earn less than $20,000 ($40,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly) will have less money in their paycheck starting in 2011.

The tax rate on long-term capital gains and qualified dividends which are most important to investors will stay the same for the next two years. All these tax changes will revert to their pre-BTC tax rates on January 1, 2013. With President Obama, all of the House of Representatives and 1/3 of senators up for reelection at the end of 2012, expect the US tax rates to be a major campaign issue in the 2012 election.

A good strategy is to always keep interest/ dividend-paying and non-tax efficient investments in your non-taxable accounts. Also, any investments for which there is a high degree of difficulty determining the tax liability, i.e. trading stocks, future contracts, exotic ETFs, etc., should be invested through your non-taxable accounts.

Between the extended Bush tax rates and payroll tax decreases (costing the US government almost $1 trillion in revenue over the next two years) and Quantitative Easing 2, the US government has created the largest stimulus ever in its quest to grow the economy and reduce a persistent US unemployment rate hovering close to 10%. If this stimulus does not lead to job growth and reduce the unemployment rate, the issue will become: how do you reduce structural unemployment issues which take a long time period to resolve? This will be difficult to resolve in the current US political environment which everything is short focus on the next election.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Changes to Capital Gain Tax Treatment of a Primary Residence

Just when we think we have the income tax laws regarding real estate figured out, the federal government has to go and change them again! This time the changes come as part of the 2008 Housing and Economic Recovery Act (HERA), H.R. 3221, an attempt on the part of government to help individuals impacted by the current mortgage crisis without spending money to do it. It's called "revenue neutral", which means that they have to collect more money from somewhere to pay for it.

The additional collection relative to real estate comes from a change in the way profits (capital gains) from the sale of a primary residence are (or are not) taxed. Currently, if a person sells a house for a profit (capital gain) after living in it as their primary residence for 2 of the past 5 years, there is no capital gain tax due on $250,000 of the gain for a single person or $500,000 for a couple. They are free to do whatever they want with the money and there are no age restrictions.

Americans are a creative people, particularly when it comes to avoiding taxes, and during the recent boom, this tax provision provided an incredibly easy way to make money. Let's look at a simplified example:

A couple owns a house (their primary residence), a vacation home and a rental house. They sell their primary residence, take $500,000 in tax-free profit and move into their rental house. They live there 2 years, sell it, take $500,000 in tax-free profit, buy a home where they want to retire and move into their vacation home. They live there 2 years, sell the former vacation home, take the tax-free profit and move into their retirement home. 3 sales, no capital gain tax.
The sale of a former rental does have some tax implications regarding recapture of depreciation, but that has been minimal relative to the potential for gain.

Congress has decided that this scenario does not fit the original intent of the law, which was to eliminate capital gain taxes on the increase in value of a person's home. As of January 1, 2009, there will still be no capital gain tax due on a profit generated by the sale of one's personal home where they have lived for 2 of the past 5 years, with the following exception:
If that home was converted to a personal home from a rental or vacation property, capital gain tax will be due on that percentage of the gain equivalent to the percentage of time that the house was used other than as a primary residence since January 1, 2009.

For most homeowners, this change will be of no concern, but many knowledgeable people have incorporated this tax provision into their financial planning. It has always been important to talk with your financial advisor or accountant before making a decision to sell property, and never more so than now.

Sunday, November 28, 2010

The Changes in Capital Gains Tax and How it Will Impact on UK Landlords

A tax giveaway for landlords?

Landlords are set to be one of the main beneficiaries from the proposed tax changes signaled by the Chancellors Pre-budget Statement last week. This Statement which outlines what changes are to be made for the tax year 08-09 or effectively the tax regime that is to come into force on the 6th April 08. How much is it a give away and are landlords better to sell now under the current capital gains tax regime or should they wait? In this article I set out to investigate what it means to landlords

The current taxation regime

The current system of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) was actually put in place by Gordon Brown in April 1998 when he introduced a system of taper relief to replace the previous system of indexation. The whole idea behind taper relief was that it encouraged businesses and property investors to hold their assets for the long term and discourage short-term investment speculation. The result was a taxation system where the amount of tax paid reduced the longer the landlord held their buy-to-let investment property for up to a maximum relief being given after 10 years of holding their residential property investment.

When does Capital Gains Tax (CGT) apply?

Capital gains tax is a tax that landlord's only pay on disposal of their buy-to-let investment property. It is treated as a top slice of taxable income and therefore the rate that a landlord will pay will depend on what income the landlord has earned in the year of disposal. In calculating a landlord's potential Capital Gains Tax (CGT) tax liability a landlord will have to apply the following concepts to their Capital Gains Tax (CGT) calculation.

1. A landlord should establish the base cost of their buy-to-let investment (effectively cost of acquisition)

2. A landlord should establish the size of the gain by taking base cost from disposal value

3. A landlord should establish if buy-to-let investment held as a non-business or as a business asset (most will be non-business, whilst holiday rentals are classed as a business asset)

4. If the buy-to-let investment property is held as an individual not by a company the landlord can use their annual exemption 2006/2007 £8800 to reduce the amount of the chargeable gain

5. For properties bought before April 6 1998 the gain is subject to indexation

6. Properties bought on or after April 6 1998 the gain is subject to taper relief

Effective rate of Capital Gains Tax (CGT)

For most landlords the effective rate of Capital Gains Tax (CGT) that a landlord will pay depends on their rate of income tax. For a landlord who is a basic rate taxpayer the effective Capital Gains Tax (CGT) rate could reduce to 12% as the percentage of the gain chargeable reduces to 60% after 10 years and this is then charged at 20%. For landlords who are top rate taxpayers the effective rate is double as they pay 40% tax.

The new regime

The new Chancellor Alistair Darling is planning to sweep away the old systems of indexation and taper relief carefully put in place by the previous Chancellor and replace the systems of indexation and taper relief with a single flat rate of 18%.

The verdict for UK landlords

On balance the news for landlords is good. The new flat rate Capital Gains Tax (CGT) will apply to a landlord immediately and means that for a high rate tax payer they will be paying 6% less than they would have done after 10 years under the previous system of taper relief. For basic rate taxpayers things are less clear cut. Under the previous system a basic rate taxpayer would have had to have held their buy-to-let investment property for 4 years before benefiting from a rate as low as 18%. However, this would have eventually reduced to 12% after 10 years or 6% below the rate that will come in on 6th April 2008.
A couple of beneficial points for landlords are that the new system is much simpler to understand and should make property investment disposal decisions and calculations much easier for landlords.

It also makes it far more attractive for landlords to trade their buy-to-let investments buying and potentially renovating a property, holding for a couple of years before then selling their buy-to-let investments on.

However, this may not be so much of a tax gift to landlords as it first appears. For a start, the anticipated slow down in the UK housing market may mean that the opportunities for buying a property and doing it up to rent and then dispose may not be as prevalent as they have been over the last 10 years of the housing boom. Also landlords should be aware that if they are doing this regularly the tax authorities may consider that the landlord is actually engaging in a trade and tax any profit as income anyway.

The reality is for most landlords buying a residential investment property is seen as a long-term investment. ARLA the Association of Residential Letting Agents latest quarterly survey (Sept 07) of landlords showed that 66% of landlords questioned intended to keep their residential investment properties for more than 10 years. These landlords would therefore have benefited from the maximum taper relief available anyway.

The proposed tax changes appear to be a classic case of smoke and mirrors where tax for some landlords i.e. high rate tax payers looks to have come down whilst those for lower rate tax risers potentially goes up.

Should landlords sell?

This potential change in the tax law has thrown up an interesting conundrum for some landlords over what to do over their buy-to-let investments.

Previously the tax system strongly encouraged them to hold their properties for the long-term to maximise their taper relief. Now, for a lower rate taxpayer who has owned their property for 10 years or more a quick disposal before the new regime would save them potentially a considerable sum.

Equally for high rate taxpayers who were thinking of a sale, holding out until the new tax regime is in place could also save them a sizeable amount of money.

Therefore, all this has to be weighed by a landlord against their wider and long-term financial plans and aspirations. If the housing market does weaken considerably by next year selling at a time of low housing demand may not be the best time to exit the market even where a tax saving.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Emergency Budget Changes on Cornwall House Sales

2010 has been a waiting game for the housing market. Pre-election many housing experts and prospective buyers were unsure how the economy was going to be affected by a possible change of government. The scrabble for power and subsequent compromises by our coalition government has continued this uncertainty. Now the Chancellor has delivered his emergency budget we have had time to review and analyse its effects. What are our predictions for the local housing market in Cornwall?

Capital Gains Tax

This has come through lower than expected, a relief for many top rate tax payers who own second homes. For the basic tax rate payer this tax remains the same as it was previously. At first glance this may appear generous but in reality the capital gains made on a property is likely to tip these tax payers into the higher tax paying category.

Overall this should not have a dramatic effect on the property market. The worst to be hit will be long term owners of second homes and rental properties who have gained substantial capital during their ownership.

A more worrying change is the open nature that the Chancellor has left for capital gains tax. Experts are suggesting that further increases could be expected in 2011. Many second home owners will need to analyse their options in detail now bearing this possible change in the future. They may consider it wise to cash in their assets now.

House Price Trends

The latest figures from the Land Registry have noted a small drop in house prices by 0.2% in May, the first drop that has been seen since April 2009. This is not reflected in all areas with Wales being the worst hit and the South East and London continuing to rise. In other regions such as the South West reports have noted that the housing market is continuing to look buoyant. Cornwall's average house price has changed from £175,541 (May 2009) to £190,556 (May 2010).

Cornish House Price Trends

Cornwall's house price trends tend to be distorted as a result of the high number of holiday homes in many of the areas. Historically this has inflated house prices above normal levels, leaving affordability a dream for many locals.

Whilst it is too early to fully see the effect of this recent budget, Cornwall's changes will be accentuated due to the high percentage of second homes. There may well be a healthy number of second homes coming onto the market in the area, helping to balance the housing stock in the region. This will mainly be affected by second home owner's long term interpretation of capital gains tax changes and how this fits in with their personal circumstances. We will have a truer picture towards the end of the summer as to how the trends will continue in 2010.

We hope continued stability will hold on in the South West, fuelling confidence in 'normal' house selling and purchasing. Confidence in this kind of market will help developers, buyers and sellers plan their housing needs and for financial institutions to keep lending for those all too important mortgages.

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Australian Federal Budget - Tax and Superannuation Changes

The Australian Treasurer, Wayne Swan, delivered the 2010-2011 Australian Federal Budget on 11 May 2010. In this article I will concentrate only on the taxation and superannuation matters that will be of more general interest. I will not cover all of the changes. Also, I will not repeat announcements that were part of the Government's response to the Henry review.

The key announcements I will discuss are: (1) An increase in the Low Income Tax Offset (2) An increase in the level of net medical expenditure necessary to obtain a tax rebate (3) An optional standard deduction for work related expenses and cost of managing tax affairs (4) A 50% discount in relation to the earning of certain interest income (5) A change in the way that Capital Gains Tax applies to earn-out arrangements (6) A permanent reduction to the superannuation co-contribution rate. (7) GST changes to the margin scheme and the financial supplies threshold. Here are the details:

Low Income Tax Offset

From the 1st of July 2010 there will be an increase from $1,350 to $1,500 of the Low Income Tax Offset. Due to this, a person that earns up to $16,000 will not have to pay income tax.

Net Medical Expenditure Threshold

Currently, if a taxpayer has net medical expenditure of $1,500 or more, a tax offset can be claimed for 20% of the expenditure above the threshold. From 1 July 2010 the threshold will be raised to $2,000, thus making it more difficult to make a claim. Also, in following years, the threshold will be indexed in line with the Consumer Price Index.

Optional Standard Deduction

In a big win for millions of taxpayers, from 1 July 2012, there will be an optional standard deduction in lieu of claiming work-related expenses and the cost of managing a person's tax affairs. This will only apply to individual taxpayers. The optional standard deduction amount will be $500 in the year ending 30 June 2013. In the year ending 30 June 2014, this amount will be $1,000. The standard deduction is optional as taxpayers will still have the ability to claim actual expenditure.

50% Discount for Interest

To encourage savings, from the 1st of July 2011, there will be a tax discount of 50% on up to $1,000 of interest earned. So if a person has $20,000 in the bank that is earning 5% interest, the whole amount of this interest will be eligible for the discount. This will also mean that some individuals and families will become eligible for Government assistance or be able to obtain larger Government assistance with such things as the Family Tax Benefit, Child Care Benefit and so forth.

Capital Gains Tax and Earn-Out Arrangements

There is going to be a change to an annoying part of the Capital Gains Tax law that relates to the sale of a business where there is an earn-out arrangement. An earn-out arrangement is used to adjust the sale price of a business depending on how it trades after the business changes hands. Typically there will be a set amount paid for the business plus a contingent amount based on trading over, say, the next 12 months. So, for example, a purchaser of a business may agree to pay a certain percentage of the gross margin of a business as further consideration for the purchase of the business.

Under the current interpretation of the law, the earn-out component is a separate asset from the underlying business. This causes a number of problems, including the inability to apply the small business CGT concessions to the earn-out component of the purchase price of the business. The Government will change the capital gains tax law so that the earn-out component of the sale price will be treated as consideration for the underlying business and not consideration for a separate right created by the contract of sale.

This change will apply from the date the law receives Royal Assent. There will be transitional provisions in certain cases from 17 October 2007.

Matching Rate for the Superannuation Co-Contribution System

The Government has announced that it will permanently keep the matching rate for the superannuation co-contribution system at 100%. Further, the maximum co-contribution will be set at $1,000.

Goods and Services Tax Changes

Turning to GST, the Government has announced that there will changes in the way the margin scheme operates. These changes will apply from 1 July 2012. There is not much detail as to how these changes will operate but the changes will be designed to address a number of problems with the current law.

Finally, the threshold below which businesses need not be concerned with making financial supplies will be increased by 3 times from $50,000 to $150,000 of input tax credits. This change will have effect from 1 July 2012.

Wishing you easier business

John M. Jeffreys